| Earth
Sciencesooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Rating: 1<5 |
|
Rare Earth by Peter D. Ward and Donald
Brownlee: |
|
If I were a creationist, I would probably love this book. It talks
about all the chance happenings that are required for life to evolve
on earth. It focuses on our solar system's formation from a nebula,
until the time earth gains a stable environment to support life.
It also discusses many different mass extinction events in earth’s
history, and their possible implications. I love this book, but
it's a bit of a wet blanket for all the Star Trek fans out there
who believe there is intelligent life just waiting to be found at
the next star.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Sociology |
|
The Lucifer Priciple by Howard Bloom: |
|
This book dealt heavily with groups of people coming together under
certain ideals or causes, and then rising up against each other.
It talked about social classes, religions, governments and other
social groups and how they work together and against each other
to increase themselves in the pecking order. Bloom also suggests
that Darwin doesn't pay enough attention to what Bloom and Dawkins
refer to as a "meme", in the selection process. A meme
is an idea that brings people together, such as a religion, or social
class. I think that social selection plays a large role and can
work much faster than sexual selection in the elimination of weaker
individuals.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Human Zoo by Desmond Morris: |
|
This is an interesting look at humans in the city, as compared to
caged animals at the zoo. There are many interesting comparisons
from anxieties to sexual frustrations and exagerations and social
interactions among others. This book was interesting from beginning
to end. It's such a simple concept that many of the truths stated
within it hold true today. Definitely an interesting insight to
the human animal.
Quote:"A rational solution is
to do away with the powerful leader figure, to regulate him to the
ancient, tribal past where he belongs, and to replace him with a
computer fed organization of independent, specialized experts."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Psychology |
|
Madness and Civilization by Michel
Foucault: |
|
This was a good book. I didn't like it much, but it was a good history
lesson on the history of madhouses and confinement of maniacs as
the method transforms from confinement to a more "talking cure".
I found the book intermittently interesting, and partly boring.
I think that's because I'm just not into it right now. I found all
the sections that dealt with actual psychology pretty interesting,
and Foucault is an amazing writer also.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| History |
|
Discipline and Punish, The Birth of the Prison
by Michel Foucault: |
|
This book tied together prisons, hospitals, the military, schools,
government, and religious institutions in such a way that helps
you understand the development of the current day's collective of
knowledge. It helps you to understand the subtlety of freedom, and
the deprivation of freedom as the symbolic punishment. The legal
institutions had to be free from the crimes they were prosecuting,
in the eyes of the people, before they could have a normative ground
to stand on with the people. For me the book is a bit of a tedious
read. My friend Scott seemed to like it, but it was difficult for
me to concentrate on, and at times, I felt like I was dredging through
it. You know Foucault; massive amounts of information to take in.
Reading Foucault is a lot like stepping into a god-mode. You become
omniscient for a time, in comparison to what you were.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Astronomy
and the Universe |
|
A Brief History of Time by Stephen Hawking: |
What is the origin of everything? Who dares to ask this question?
Hawking does a great job of starting out his book with basic astronomy,
and works his way up to the theories of the universe from about
a few years ago. This book is not really recent, but if you’re
not a specialist in the field, it won’t make a difference
to you, trust me. It only took me about three days to read the whole
thing. It's short and full of information. A great lesson on relativity.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
The Chomsky/Foucault Debate on Human Nature by
Chomsky and Foucault |
For some reason I was under the impression that Chomsky and Foucault
got into a disagreement at this debate, but it just seems like they
have different approaches to their studies. I view Chomsky as a
believer in an a priori type limitation on knowledge, and Foucault
is more of a relativist who believes that values are determined
by the norms of where the live, and the transfer of power. Interesting
study though.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
Nature
Studies and Evolution |
|
The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin: |
| Is this book 100% fact? Definitely not. But Darwin
is the first to admit it. Anyone who discards Darwin's theories
without actually reading the book is irrational at best. There are
many tests and observations by Darwin that are 100% true and factual
that can benefit anybody. I really enjoyed it and am proud to say
I've read it.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Descent of Man by Charles Darwin: |
|
This is definitely a tedious read. I can only imagine that the naturalists
of today look to Darwin as a rare mind. I found it hard to believe
while I was reading about the development of the mind, I was seeing
it first hand in its rarest form as Darwin's studies. If you read
one of his books, I suggest Origin of Species, because I feel it's
a better and a more informative read on the whole. In The Descent
of Man, Darwin doesn't even really talk about man that much. He
talks mainly about sexual selection in animals, as it would help
us to understand man's selection. Not an easy read by any means.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Blind Watchmaker by Richard Dawkins: |
|
This guy's pretty funny. It's hard to take him seriously at first,
but after being bombarded with facts for a while you start to realize
it's all in good fun. One thing I learned from this book was that
other theories bring forth plausible arguments for their ideas.
After reading any one of the theories he deconstructs, I totally
thought that the originator of the theory had a good point, and
each time it was proven to me how much I really know about selection
and genetics. Unless you’re really strong on the subject you
could understandably be swayed. Dawkins himself admits there is
possible minor discrepancies with the Darwinian theory, and sometimes
odd facts that turn science upside down, but, as Dawkin states,
even if the evidence did not support Darwinian theory (but it does),
it's still the best theory out there right now, and on this subject
I whole heartedly agree with him.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
God, the Devil, and Darwin by Niall Shanks: |
Interesting book. They talk about self forming molecules that take
a hexegon type form when you boil water, and they also talk about
self forming circuits that form when certain chemicals are put together
in a dish. They basically explain why the current Intelligent Design
theories are actually quite explainable. I'm not a professional
biochemist, or quantum physicist, so it's really hard to know where
fact ends and theory begins. Interesting ethics read though.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Biology |
|
Chance and Necessity by Jacques
Monod |
|
I really liked this book. He claims that your DNA is only a transmitter
of information, it can't take any cues from the nervous system about
the environment. He claims that mutation occurs, causing chance
based evolution, because of "white noise" moving around
the DNA causing minor "knockouts" and causing the DNA
to mutate and make copies of itself with that mutation. I really
like that theory, but I'm not a professional biologist so, I don't
really know the whole story, but very interesting.
Quote:"As for the highest human
qualities, courage, altruism, generosity, creative ambition, the
ethic of knowledge, both recognizes their sociobiological origin
and affirms their transcendent value in the service of the ideal
it defines."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Physics |
|
Warped Passages by Lisa Randall |
|
This book reminds me of reading Hawking's, A Brief History of Time.
It starts out with basic lessons that are understandable, and intuitive,
and gradually moves off into crazy crazy mathematical space. I think
for the last 25% of the book I was hanging on by a thread. Randall
describes many ideas that could be very interesting if you are a
person who has fun thinking about metaphysics, because, these particle
physics theories are like mathematical metatheories. It's fun to
look at the world around you, and think about these dimensional
theories, because there is so much we can understand, but we just
can't put our finger on. I think the shadows of dimensions we don't
comprehend have an effect on what we do see, just as the wind effects
the trees.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Sleep
and Dream Science |
|
Dreaming by J. Allan Hobson: |
|
I actually bought a few books on dreaming. This one seemed to be
the easier to read of them so I started with this. It's very interesting,
the recent studies of consciousness. This book explains the chemical
reactions in the brain that send you from waking consciousness,
into the dream states. Hobson points out the different areas of
the brain that become active or shut down as you move from waking
through the different stages of sleep. This is a very good introductory
book into the modern dream sciences.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
| Government |
|
The Good Fight by Ralph Nader: |
|
What can I say? I totally agree with Ralph Nader. All the points
about corporate control, his points about the Bush administration
and the growing gap between the rich and the poor are right on.
The examples of medical insurance companies, workman’s compensation
and credit card companies providing little to no service in exchange
for you paying outrageous rates is something we feel everyday. When
you leave your house worried about your bills, your future, your
retirement, your family's future, the people who are causing you
to carry these worries with you everyday have no idea how you feel
because they themselves are rich, and can by no means empathize
or even adequately sympathize with you without endangering their
profits. After reading his book I'm convinced that this so called
"democracy" is every man for himself, and I'm also convinced
that ignorance is delusional bliss.
Quote: "Farts disturb more people
than oderless pollution or global warming. Thoughtless ethnic slights
rile more people than widespread lead poisening of children and
skyrocketing levels of childhood asthma."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
Hegemony or Survival by Noam Chomsky: |
|
This is a really crazy, and also scary book. If you are a lap dog
for the US, and you don't have a dissident bone in your body you
should definetely change your knowledge base. Even if your a dove,
you should have at least some critical knowledge of your government
and this book could provide it for you. It speaks eloquently of
the US's policy of imposing it's international legal norms on other
countries, while breaking those same international laws themselves,
even more than any other country. Another thing that might well
sicken you is the amount US's abstanations and vetos in the UN against
a unanimous world. I'm proud this current administration doesn't
represent me personally.
Quote: "It is easy to dismiss
the world as "irrelevant" or consumed by "paranoid
anti-Americanism," but perhaps not wise."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
Everything You Know is Wrong by
Russ Kick |
|
I think this is a good book for the beginning watchdogs. It goes
into so many different subjects, but it doesn't really go into each
one of them enough. They are basically short essays that give you
the tip of the iceberg, but not much of the base. But, if your an
unquestioning believer most of the time, you might at least start
to acquire that sense of doubt that's necessary to critically understand
our media, and government, and other interest groups. You can't
believe the headlines all the time. I wonder myself if you can believe
them at all, since their success is driven by whether or not the
general population approves of the subjects they write about, and
the government leads the general population along with it's "path
of least civil resistance" limited information. Anyway, the
book goes into some examples of this. If you’re already an
intermediate hawk, I wouldn't waste your time, but there is a good
book review section at the end.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The 911 Comission Report by The
National Commission of Terrorist Attacks |
|
There was a lot of interesting information in this tome. It was
quite tedious though. What was interesting was the way you felt
like you had a God's eye view of what happened, like a dream that
you could see things happening but you were powerless to see them
coming. The stories about the first responders on 911 was riveting,
and engrossing. This is the closest thing to actually being in the
buildings rescuing people. Another thing I learned is George Bush
was not actually the leading suggestor of the Iraq war. I'm no Bush
supporter, for sure, but Wolfowitz is the ass munch that was adamant
about going into Iraq. According to the commission Bush resisted
this idea at first because he wanted to focus on Afghanistan. I
respect that position, although he ultimately caved in, which I
am disappointed about. Wolfowitz should fucking die. I'll throw
a party, and laugh too. I do believe it is every American's duty
to read this book. That is why I read it, I feel it is our duty
to know the government failing, and to understand the current threats
better.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Philosophical
Studies |
|
A Little Flesh, A Little Breath, and A Reason to Rule
All- That is Myself
by Marcus Aurelius |
|
This is a beautiful book. This will teach you how to be a good person
through inward contemplation. His views on suicide, and death are
very similar to my own. Though he talks about the Gods, he does
so in a reasonable sense, also arguing different points of view
out of agnosticism. He is far more enlightened than many people
today who think they understand. I'm going to use Marcus as a model
while I try to better myself. I highly recommend this book.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Why I am not a Christian by
Bertrand William Russell |
|
Russell has a very smooth writing style. His ideas on the destructive
nature of Christianity, and also what is good about it, and why
it is good are very similar to my own. They would probably be similar
to any reasonable, open minded, critical thinking individual. When
you read about how he was prevented from teaching at university
because of his views, you feel repugnant that American law can be
bent and destroyed so obviously in the name of American conservatism.
This all took place around 1940's.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Introducing Romanticism by
Duncan Heath, and Judy Boreham |
|
I learned a lot about what I didn't know about Romanticism in this
book. I found the stories about The Grand Tour very interesting.
I actually bought Rousseau's The Confessions to read about his experience
on The Grand Tour. What I learned was that Romaniticism was first
despised, then accepted, then despised, then accepted again, and
is about to become despised again in my opinion. I don't support
exaggeration of what is observable, but I support individuality.
According to the book the search within is a romantic pursuit. I
don't consider myself romantic, but I am searching out my individuality,
so I remain agnostic and ambiguous about this. I highly recommend
the book. It's very short.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Contingency, Hegemony, Universality by
Judith Butler, Ernesto Laclau, Slavoj Zizek |
|
This was sweeeeet. If you are interested in cutting edge psychology,
philosophy, government, sociology, etc. then this book is definitely
in the now. I have read a few Zizek books, so I new what to expect.
Anyway, I'm working on a utopian ideal government model myself,
so this book was very valuable to me. It talks a lot about Hegel,
and Lacan. The universals in social change, and in hegemony are
definitely focused on. I definetely have a better grasp of freedom,
Kant, symbolsim, and writing styles. For anybody who spends any
time in a philosophy forum, this is the forums on steroids; uber-forums.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
One Hundred Philosophers by Peter
J. King |
|
The title is pretty self explanitory with this book. It basically
takes you through early greek, through Eastern, and African philosophies.
There is women philosophers as well as men. It tells you what each
philosopher was known for, gives you their birth and death dates
and where they lived, and who their influences were. It's basically
the kind of book that any philosopher wishes he had committed to
memory.
oooooooooooo00oooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
For the New Intellectual by Ayn
Rand |
|
This book scares the shit out of me. If you really want to feel
insignificant about who you are as a person, I mean if you really
want to know the truth of your standing then this is the book for
you. I didn't really agree with some of the concepts, but alot of
them I did. Essentially this book makes you want to study all aspects
of philosophy and life so you don't fall into the traps that she
describes. Really a deep book. Not for the meek of heart. If your
going to read this book, be prepared to either defend yourself from
a life change, or be ready to accept it as it comes. I'm still pretty
tripped out about what I've read.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Critique of Religion and Philosophy by
Walter Kaufmann |
|
This was a great book. It also contributed to my ideal of Evolutionary
Panentheism by touting certain Theologians such as Tillich. I cannot
recommend this book enough. It talks all about similarites between
different religions, and histories. Written perfectly and unbiased,
but directed at people with a desire for unslanted agenda ridden
opinions. Great great book. I'll probably read it again. Thanks
Kaufmann!
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Return
of the Primitive/The Anti-Industrial Revolution
by Ayn Rand and Peter Schwartz |
|
Basically this book will make you hate liberals and environmentalists.
After reading it I can't really imagine what any liberal or environmentalist
could ever say to me to believe in their cause. Essentially what
they're saying is environmentalists hate technology because ultimately
they're primitivists, but they never acknowledge that man has gained
almost 50 years on his life due to technology, all they do is talk
about destruction of the environment. Man has no right to exist
on earth for himself, he must commit what amounts to industrial
suicide, or technological regression. It's definitely an interesting
perspective.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Philosophy of Nietzsche Edited by Geoffrey
Clive |
|
Nietzsche was obviously a profound thinker. This book divides his
work into interesting subjects such as art, religion, morality,
music etc. I really love his writing. The writing doesn't necessarily
make me change my point of view, but it helps me add more significance
to the beliefs I already have. I could easily read this book five
more times and find many new ideas every time. I have an augmented
sense of respect and value now, with Nietzsche's help, and he is
the first person I will project these feelings upon.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
Beyond Good and Evil by Friedrich
Nietzsche, Translation: Walter Kaufman |
|
Of course an amazing book. I like how Nietzsche seems to be able
to look into the future, by studying closely the great thinkers,
and he seems to be able to simulate what will happen in future thinking.
Definitely gives you the feeling of "God mode".
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Portable Plato Edited by Scott
Buchanan |
|
This portable Plato had Protagoras, The Symposium, Phaedo, and The
Republic. One thing's for sure, Socrates is a wind bag. I can see
so many places to refute his arguements, but his partner in discourse
rarely questions him. All they ever say is, "So right.",
or "Undeniably." Anyway, aside from the fact that you
want to jump in and ask questions, and you can't, it was pretty
interesting. One of the most interesting things about reading Plato
is you read about many things that you see in society today, that
you knew no history about, and now they are clear. I like that.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Hegel, A Very Short Introduction by
Peter Singer |
|
This was alot of good insite to Hegel. I've read about him second
hand in other people's writing, but never studied him directly.
Obviously he's very interesting. I don't really agree with his ideas
on free will, but other ideas I did. It's cool too because in order
to explain Hegel in such a small book, the author had to give you
a crash course in things I'm still trying to understand, so it was
a good general philosophy book also. Pretty cool.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Pleasure of Hating by William
Hazlitt |
|
This was a very short "Penguin Books" amalgam of Hazlitt's
articles and writings. The first story was about a boxing match,
the second was about a juggling Indian, and a few stories about
government and the people. The last piece I felt was unbearably
negative, and while I do support the idea that cynics, and pessimists
could possibly have more possitivity to offer creatively than the
optimists, and rainbow, flower and sunshine happy people, I think
this piece by Hazlitt was genuinely degrading to the human race
as far as an overall judgemental accusation about violence and character.
I never support human haters and have been known to call them "Human
Traitors", and I am on the verge of putting Hazlett in this
category.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Postmodernism For Beginners by
Jim Powell |
|
This was an interesting read, though I'm not sure I really like
the author. This book gives you a pretty good picture of postmodernity
though. Before I read it I was annoyed by the many points of view
that constitute postmodernism, but now I have a pretty good idea.
It seems to be the age old discussion about universality vs. relativity.
Of course postmodernism is relative. It is a mixture of culture,
and ease of information travel, and advertisements. It's about the
mixing of culture in architecture, and art, and a redifining of
the real. While the book tries to say universality is over, basically,
which was annoying to me, I believe the balace is to be found in
a mix of universatily and relativity. Postmodernity is only the
representation of the infatuation with the escape from the universal,
but the productive truths of the future will come from a conscious
synthesis of the two.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Alternative
Philosophy |
|
The Fundamentals of Thought by
L. Ron Hubbard |
|
I heard from alot of people that Scientology was strange, and weird.
I rememember someone picking us up when we were kids and showing
us a movie and we all laughed at it. I never really understood it.
So I'm reading it now to know why people don't accept it on a large
scale. It started out very interesting with basic philosophy, and
mathematics of feelings and such and I was actually starting to
like it. Then, out of no where it shot way off into left feild talking
about the spirit and such. They have some interesting hypothesis
about lying, and mental conditioning but I would definetely lable
it as mysticism when it talks about the spirit. They claim it's
all proven by laboratory studies, but there's really no research
notes, or dates or names of doctors conducting the studies or anything
like that, so you definitely have to be cautious with your beliefs.
I always am anyway. If your easily impressionable, I suggest you
read some of the major religions before you subject yourself to
reading this type of philosophy.
Quote:"Where the affinity level
is hate, the agreement is solid matter, and the communications....bullets."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
Dianetics by L. Ron Hubbard |
|
This is actually a pretty interesting book, though it is quite long.
It talks about two different parts of the mind, the analytical mind,
and the reactive mind. The reactive mind records feelings of pain,
and any other environmental stimulus that may be present. Then,
later in time, any of the environmental stimuli could trigger the
somatic pain, or whatever feelings were present at the time. There's
a lot more to it than that, but that's a basic idea in the larger
picture of what he talks about. Don't confuse this book with Scientology.
The practice of Scientology did come out of Dianetics, but there
is nothing strange or unusual about Dianetics itself. It seems like
it could be helpful. I know a lot of people think it's crazy, and
I bet almost all of them have never read it. It could do a better
job of listing studies, doctor’s names and dates and information
like that. They basically just tell you to believe that they did
the studies. I don't really like that. Anyway, it could be a good
book to read if you’re interested in alternative psychology
and philosophy.
Quote:"No self-interest can be
so great as to demand the slaughter of mankind. He who would demand
it, he who would not by every rational means avert it, is insane.
There is no justification for war."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
|
The Satanic Bible by Anton Szandor
LaVey |
|
Meh.... nothing really special about this. It seems like it was
just basically put together to spite the religions of Jesus. The
rituals and basic philosophies in the book are basically just opposite
absolutes of Jesus' teachings. I do believe in the pursuit of carnal
pleasure as explained by the what little philosophy is presented
in this book, but I consider it to be more of a humanist philosophy
adopted by this esoteric cult writing. There was a couple nice history
lessons about Greek and Roman gods, and an interesting history lesson
on the origin of Satan that I have to check a second source to verify,
but it seems that a great number of the rituals and practices performed
by the Catholic and Christian churches of today are taken directly
from Pagan ritual. It's a testament to the twisting and contorting
of the true untainted teachings of Jesus by the religious groups.
In my opinion no religious group today follows true to form.
Quote:"The angel of self-deciet
is camped in the souls of the "righteous"--The eternal
flame of power through joy dwelleth within the flesh of the Satanist!"
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 |
2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
Intelligent Design by William A.
Dembski |
|
This was a good book. I really like the way Dembski uses people
from the past to argue his points. I've seen many people do this,
but he seems to do it very well. While I do accept his academics
as an individual, what he is suggesting is not proof, or definitive
in any way, though it does give this illusion. If you've already
got momentum, heading in Dembski's direction, more than likely you'll
feel vindicated, and you'll feel like science is your enemy. While
I will agree that science might make some political decisions sometimes,
and say they are based on fact, when it comes down to empirical
evidence, everything is put to public scrutiny. This is what gives
science its integrity. The creationist wants you to believe that
this is all a conspiracy theory, and science is a secular religion.
This is totally unfounded, since the word religion means to worship
a god, which science doesn't. Science is the antithesis of theology.
Theory is not theology.
Quote:"Is it a fact that the
full panoply of life has evolved through purposeless naturalistic
processes? This might be a fact, but whether it is a fact is very
much open to debate."
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4
| 5 |
Literary
Studies |
|
Looking Awry by Slavoj Zizek |
Crazy, crazy book. Basically this book takes shows from today, and
the past and compares them to the mind, philosophy and psychology.
It reads like training for writers on how to construct their stories.
The best thing I learned from this is "The Golden Rule",
"Do unto others as you'd have done to you.", is all misleading.
Everybody is different. What you'd have done to you, might be very
offensive to someone else, so watch your step, and do your best
not to infringe on the other persons fantasy. That is how you can
be virtuous. Really get to know the people around you, and bend
to make their lives easier for them.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
The Puppet
and the Dwarf, The Perverse Core of Christianity by Slavoj
Zizek |
If you asked me to tell you exactly what the entire book was about,
it would definitely be difficult to sum up. It moved in so many
areas, it was more of a broad picture, than an articulated single
point.To all the theists out there, don't judge a book by its cover.
Especially with this one. While you might think from the title it
is a Christianity bashing book, it actually pin points the ideas
that make Christianity valuable, while highlighting the parts of
it that are destructive and should be dissolved. For all of you
fundamentalists who think that the Christian bible is perfect exactly
the way it is, because of "divine intervention", do your
history homework. Blind faith wont give you the moral high ground
outside your esoteric group of other "blind faithers"
any more.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
Fiction |
|
The Da Vinci Code by Dan Brown |
This book demonstrated a great concept in my opinion. Dan Brown
takes historical places and stories, then layers his theory on top
of that, then he layers a fiction story on that. So basically it
goes history; theory; fiction. For me this is exactly how our consciousness
is structured. We use ideas we think we know (history) and we try
to predict the future (theory) and we also posit mythology (fiction)
outside of reason and theory. I think Dan Brown's conception fits
the human mind like a key. I don't see any point in arguing what
is true and what isn't in the book, because, just like most anoying
arguements, at this time it is all subjective at its end.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
The Fantasies of Robert A. Heinlein by Robert
A. Heinlein |
|
Heinlein is an interesting writer. He seems fascinated with science
fiction, temporal paradox, and other odd themes. I was rather annoyed
with his reoccurring concept of psychosomatic manipulation. It only
happens because you believe it happens, and so forth. Some of the
concepts are rudimentary, but others are highly creative. I guess
that is what makes it real. Anyway, definitely worth reading if
your a Sci-Fi buff.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
| Religious
Studies |
|
Catholicism and Christianity |
| The Holy Bible |
|
Islam |
| The Qur'an |
|
Buddhism |
| The Four Noble Truths
- Venerable Ajahn Sumedho
The Meaning of Life - Venerable Chan Master Sheng Yen
Buddhism, You too can Understand - Clement Yat-Biu Ching
Good Question, Good Answer - Venerable S. Dhammika
|
|
Zoroastrians and Their Religious Beliefs
and Practices by Mary Boyce |
|
Zoroaster founded the fundamental religious tenents that we have
in the world today contrary to what people might believe. One idea
I though was cool, is that the book mentions while the rest of other
religions spent their time praying on their knees bowing in fear
before their God, the Zoroastrians stand up tall with pride. They
also burn eternal fires in their temples, and hold the earth sacred.
In ancient times the put their dead in towers with open roofs so
birds would eat the bodies. Zoroaster, as far as we know, lived
3000 years ago.
Quote: "Zoroaster was thus the
first to teach the doctrines of an individual judgement, Heaven
and Hell, the future resurrection of the body, the general Last
Judgement, and life everlasting for the reunited soul and body."
|
| Finance
and Management |
|
How to Get Rich by Donald Trump: |
|
This was an interesting book if you’re into the self-help
type of book. It tells you how to act positively and how to deal
with people on a management level. The part I found most interesting
was when he talked about a week in his life. You'd be amazed at
how many phone calls this guy takes every day. Over 100! When reading
this part I became convinced that I would go mad!
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
| How to Make Money
in Stocks by William J. O'neil: |
|
This books seemed like an endless plug for the website that works
hand in hand with it, but it was definitely prestigious and taught
me alot about the market. It's definitely a good book for the beginning
individual stock trader.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| The 100 Best
Trends of 2005 by George Ochoa and Melinda Corey: |
|
It seems like nano-technology is definitely taking off. They've
got some crazy new metal made out of carbon atoms that's stronger
than steel, and far more light. There's also interesting insight
into religion, government and pharmacy technology.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Comics
and Fantasy Novels
|
|
Akira by Katsuhiro Otomo / Volumes 1-6: |
This was a literary masterpiece. The style of these books is “Manga”,
which means "comic" in Japanese. The perspective illustrations,
and the story line are amazing. It's about 2000 pages long and it
was written in about 10 years. That's about four pages a week, which
seems impossible to do when you see how intricate the artwork is.
I could never say how great this was, you'd have to read it. It's
better than any movie. It's also very different and more detailed
than the animated movie made after it.
oooooooooooo00ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooRating:
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
|
|
|